Legal Opinion

Humphreys v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 25, 1967No. C.D. 3128PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FoRD, Judge:

The merchandise, the subject of this protest, was classified under the provisions of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, item 685.50, as “other” radiotelegraphic or radiotelephonic transmission and reception apparatus, dutiable at 15 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiffs contend that the merchandise, invoiced as “stereo cabinets,” is classifiable under TSUS, item 727.35, as other wood furniture, dutiable at 10.5 per centum ad valorem, or, alternatively, as parts of a radio-phonograph combination under TSUS, item 685.30, dutiable at 13.75 per centum ad valorem.

The competing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. M. H. Pulaski Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. William Adams, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Necchi Sewing Machine Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Midland International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Porter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. United States v. PorterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  4. Sankyodai Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API