New York Merchandise Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mollison, Judge:
The merchandise the subject of this protest was described in the opening statement of counsel for the plaintiff as “piano benches” and was assessed with duty at the rate of 16% per centum ad valorem under the provision in.paragraph 412, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, for manufactures of wood, not specially provided for. The protest claim is for duty at the rate of 11% per centum ad valorem under the provision in the same paragraph, as modified by T.D. 54108, for furniture, wholly or in chief value of wood, other than chairs.
When the protest was called for trial, counsel for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Benjamin Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. GandolfiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Humphreys v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Furniture Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- BP Oil Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.