Murphy v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
This appeal brings before us for review two judgments of the Board of General Appraisers, each confirming the classification by the collector at the port of Philadelphia of certain merchandise as manufactures of metal under paragraph 399, Tariff Act of 1922, at 40 per centum ad valorem.
The importers protested against the classification in each of the three entries involved, making various claims. The only claims, however, made in this court are that the merchandise imported is properly dutiable as parts of textile machinery Hot specially provided for, at 35 per centum, under paragraph 372 of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. SchoverlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Norma Co. of America v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Robertson v. GerdanSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Myers v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
3Cited by12 opinions
- Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
- Humphreys v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- University of Chicago v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
- Jack Bryan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- Protest 106783-K of Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.