Legal Opinion

Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 3, 1971No. C.D. 4227PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LaNdis, Judge:

This protest involves manufactured articles described as “NGK Insulators1 (Machinery Parts of Porcelain for Lighting [sic] Arresters),” imported from Japan and entered at New York.

Customs classified the articles as dutiable at 30 per centum ad valorem under TSUS (Tariff Schedules of the United States) item 535.14, which, in the pertinent context of schedule 5, part 2, subpart D, provides as follows:

Ceramic magnets, ceramic electrical insulators whether or not in part of metal, and other ceramic electrical ware, including ferroelectric and piezoelectric ceramic elements :

535.11…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Humphreys v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Naftone, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. United States v. Mitsubishi International Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Westinghouse Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API