Legal Opinion

William Adams, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 5, 1966No. C.D. 2670PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Judge:

The above-enumerated protests, consolidated at trial, cover entries of various glass articles which were classified by the collector under paragraph 218(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802 and T.D. 51898, as household or table articles dutiable at 50 cents on each article, but not less than 30 per centum nor more than 50 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff contends, alternatively, that the merchandise is classifiable as manufactures of glass, not specially provided for, under paragraph 230(d) of said act, as modified by T.D. 52739, and dutiable thereunder at 25…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. Ace Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Norge Division, Borg-Warner Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Jack Schaefer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  5. William Adams, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Humphreys v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Asiatic Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. B. Axelrod & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  4. Hudson Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Fontana Hollywood Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API