Legal Opinion

John v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1992No. D-1557PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a condemnation case. At issue is whether landowners are entitled to notice providing an opportunity to timely object after a condemnation award is filed with the trial court. The court of appeals held that Paul F. John, Lillie John and John’s Welding & Construction Inc. (collectively “the Johns”) did not file timely objections to the condemnation award because the timetable for objecting to the award starts with the filing of the award, not the sending or receiving of notice. A majority of this court holds that, in a condemnation proceeding, the parties’ time to object to the special…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Petro-Chemical Transport, Inc. v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Pearson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Coastal Industrial Water Authority v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Bloom v. Bloom, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  5. Balios v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. FKM Partnership, Ltd. v. Board of RegentsTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Texas Department of Transportation and City of Edinburg v. A.P.I. Pipe and Supply, L.L.C. and Paisano Service Company, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Gulf Energy Pipeline Co. v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
  4. Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  5. State v. PR Investments & Specialty Retailers, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API