Legal Opinion

Texas Department of Transportation and City of Edinburg v. A.P.I. Pipe and Supply, L.L.C. and Paisano Service Company, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2013No. 10-1020PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Willett

Texas legal rules governing real-estate transactions demand assiduousness, lest *165uncertainty subvert the orderly transfer of property. This inverse-condemnation dispute over ten acres in Hidalgo County asks a simple question: Who has title to the parcel? The answer turns on the validity of conflicting recorded judgments:

1. 2003 Judgment — which the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and the City of Edinburg claim gives the City fee-simple ownership, subject to a drainage easement granted to TxDOT.

2. 200k Judgment — which A.P.I. Pipe Supply, LLC and Paisano Service Company, Inc.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. City of Tyler v. LikesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Westland Oil Development Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Christopher RhuleTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Perryman v. Spart an Tex. Six Capital Partners, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. City of Austin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  4. City of New Braunfels, Texas v. Carowest Land, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2014
  5. St. Maron v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API