Pearson v. State
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker
This is a condemnation proceeding in which neither party filed timely objections to the award of the commissioners. The attempted appeal of the landowner, John B. Pearson, Jr., who is petitioner here, from the judgment entered by the County Judge has been dismissed by the Court of Civil Appeals for want of jurisdiction. 307 S.W. 2d 159. It is our opinion that the intermediate court had no jurisdiction of the appeal, and its judgment of dismissal will accordingly be affirmed.
An account of the events leading up to the appeal is necessary to an understanding of petitioner’s argument. The initial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parker v. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
- Fortune v. KillebrewTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- City of Big Spring v. GarlingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Sinclair v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Hardy v. City of ThrockmortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by156 opinions
- Dallas County Appraisal District v. Funds Recovery, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Amason v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Denton County v. BrammerTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Texas Department of Transportation and City of Edinburg v. A.P.I. Pipe and Supply, L.L.C. and Paisano Service Company, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1965
151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.