Keely v. Metropolitan Edison Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OrasriON by
Hirt, J.,
Questioning the award of compensation affirmed .by the lower court, appellant contends that claimant’s husband when injured was not in the course of his employment, and that in any view a causal connection between the accident and his death has not been established.
George E. Neely’s home was in Reading where he was employed by Metropolitan Edison Company as a registered surveyor at monthly wages of $250. lie had made a preliminary survey of the location of a proposed transmission line near the City of Easton and on February 2, 1941, was sent back there by his employer to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Haddock v. Edgewater Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Wesolowski v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Messer v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Cymbor v. Binder Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Cronin v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hohman v. George H. Soffel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Walker v. Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Hohman v. George H. Soffel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945