Legal Opinion

Hohman v. George H. Soffel Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1945No. Appeal, 126PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baudrige, P. J.,

It is admitted on the record in this compensation case “that the claimant, on December 24, 1941 was injured in an automobile accident as a result of which he became totally disabled immediately and is still totally disabled.”

The right to an award hinges on whether claimant at the time of the accident was actually engaged in the furtherance of his employer’s business or affairs as provided by section 301, article III, of the Act of 1915, June 2, P. L. 736, as last amended by the Act of 1939, June 21, P. L. 520, 77 PS §411. The board affirmed the referee, who made an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haddock v. Edgewater Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Knorr v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Messer v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Miller v. Keystone Appliances, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Nilsson v. Nepi Brothers (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Susman v. Kaufmann's Department StoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Lints v. Delaware Bibbon Manufacturers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Keim v. BURKHOLDERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API