Legal Opinion

Hohman v. George H. Soffel Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1946No. Appeal, 8PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Jones,

In this case, the referee concluded, that the claimant was entitled to compensation on the ground that the accident which caused the injuries for which claim was made had “occurred while the claimant was furthering the business of his employer”. The referee accordingly made an award for admittedly total disability in accordance with the schedule prescribed by Section 306 (a) of the Workmens Compensation Act. of 1915 as amended (77 P.S. § 511). Upon successive appeals by the employer and its insurance carrier, the award was affirmed in turn by the Workmen’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haddock v. Edgewater Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Stahl v. Watson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Messer v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Miller v. Keystone Appliances, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Knowles v. Parker Wylie Carpet Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Biddle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Susman v. Kaufmann's Department StoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Spry v. PoltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API