Legal Opinion

Marion Richards Hair Des., Inc. v. Jour. Barb. Etc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1962No. 36025PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, a corporation (two principal

stockholders and five employees are former members of defendants’ union) commenced this action against Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers, Cosmetologists & Proprietors International Union of America Local 195-A and its business agent to enjoin defendants from picketing plaintiff’s place of business and to recover damages, as plaintiff might thereafter amend its complaint.

Defendants appeal from an “Injunction Pendente Lite” 1 that enjoins them from picketing plaintiff’s place of business and from coercing plaintiff’s employees to become members of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Isthmian Steamship Co. v. National Marine Engineers' Beneficial Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Dudley v. Jack Waite Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Kennedy v. Real Estate Salesmen Local 154AWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Davis v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rabon v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Rabon v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Chaney v. FetterlyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Chaney v. FetterlyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. County of King v. ChismanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API