Legal Opinion

Rabon v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1998No. 64942-1PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

Petitioner Wilton Rabón contends that the trial court erred by denying a preliminary injunction preventing destruction of his two dogs pursuant to Seattle animal control ordinances. He contends the local ordinances conflict with state statutes governing dogs and that the local ordinances are therefore constitutionally invalid. He also argues he was denied due process. The Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s decision. We conclude that state law does not preempt the local ordinances. However, the local ordinances provide that petitioner is entitled to a hearing to present reasons why the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. BashWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Brown v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. City of Bellingham v. SchamperaWashington Supreme Court · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Rabon v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. HaddockWashington Supreme Court · 2000

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API