Legal Opinion
In Re Corrinet
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 19, 2011No. 10-35568PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge A. WALLACE TASHIMA; Dissent by Judge IKUTA.
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
We are called upon to review the revocation of an attorney’s membership in the District of Oregon bar on the ground that he is not a member of the Oregon State Bar.
I
Mark Corrinet is an attorney and a member of The State Bar of California. He moved to Oregon about ten years ago and sought to take the Oregon bar examination, but he was not permitted to sit for the exam at that time.1 Nonetheless, in 2002, Corrinet was admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the District of Oregon,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alliance of Nonprofits for Ins v. Brett BarrattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Fort Belknap Housing Department v. Office of Public & Indian HousingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- In Re Stephen YagmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- 1600 East Newlands Drive, LLC v. Amazon.com.NDVC, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- 1600 East Newlands Drive, LLC v. Amazon.com.NDVC, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.