Legal Opinion
Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in Interest
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 1, 1977No. 76-2156PublishedCited by 502 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*652WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Bauman and Espinóla, plaintiffs in a sex-discrimination-in-employment suit brought against Union Oil Company under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., moved the district court to certify their action as a class action pursuant to Rule 23(b)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P. Pursuant to Rule 23(c)(1) and (d)(2), the court conditionally certified the class, ordered the plaintiffs to “give individual notice to- all class members identifiable through reasonable effort,” and prescribed the contents of the notice. Bauman and Espinóla (hereafter referred to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by502 opinions
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Calderon v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Batzel v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. United States District Court for Northern Mariana IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
497 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.