Legal Opinion

Fort Belknap Housing Department v. Office of Public & Indian Housing

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 8, 2013No. 12-70221PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEA, Circuit Judge:

Overview

This case involves a federal rent-subsidy program for Indian Tribes and Tribally Designated Housing Entities (“TDHE”) that lease housing to Indians. The program provides per-unit payments while the Tribe or TDHE is leasing housing units to Indians, with a view that each unit eventually be conveyed to the Indian lessees. When the Tribe or TDHE conveys a unit, or a unit becomes eligible to be conveyed, unless such a conveyance is impractical, the Tribe should no longer receive rent subsidy money for the unit.

What happened here? The Fort Belknap Housing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Lennard L. MeadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. In Re CorrinetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Modoc Lassen Indian Housing Authority v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. Modoc Lassen Indian Housing Authority v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Crow Tribal Housing Authority v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Housing Authority of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2015
  5. Modoc Lassen Indian Housing Authority v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API