Legal Opinion
In Re Stephen Yagman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 14, 2012No. 11-56245UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Stephen Yagman appeals the disbarment order issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. We review for abuse of discretion. See In re Corrinet, 645 F.3d 1141, 1145 (9th Cir.2011).
Yagman argues that the district court erred by disbarring him because the California disbarment, upon which the federal disbarment was based, “was effected without a full hearing or due process.” The district court found that although Yagman did not receive an evidentiary hearing, “he did file a brief in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pacific Harbor Capital, Inc.,plaintiff-Appellee v. Carnival Air Lines, Inc.,defendant, and Jeffrey M. Herman Stuart S. Mermelstein, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- The Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California v. John M. RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In Re CorrinetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. YagmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Crandall v. Starbucks Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- In Re: STEPHEN YAGMANCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022