Legal Opinion

Brownfield v. Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1989No. B032109PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (A. M.), P. J.

Appellant Kathleen Brownfield filed an action in which she sought, on behalf of herself and the general public, a declaration that Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital’s failure “to provide information about and access to estrogen pregnancy prophylaxis to rape victims as part of their emergency medical treatment . . . constitutes a failure to provide optimal emergency treatment of rape victims in accordance with the standard of good medical practice in Los Angeles County; . . .” She further sought an injunction ordering Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital (respondent) to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Blatty v. New York Times Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hutnick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Application Group, Inc. v. Hunter Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Sweetwater Union High Sch. Dist. v. Julian Union Elementary Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Estes v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. C.J.L. Construction, Inc. v. Universal PlumbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API