Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Estes v. Rowland

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1993No. A048296PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

The California Department of Corrections and the director of the department, James Rowland (hereinafter collectively the Department), appeal a trial court injunction that limits the Department’s ability to conduct *516random searches of prison visitors’ vehicles on prison property. The Department asserts the injunctive conditions effectively prevent it from conducting the vehicle searches, and maintains the injunction is contrary to settled authority holding that prison visitors consent to searches of their vehicles while on prison property. The Department further complains the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hewlett v. Squaw Valley Ski Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. People v. LowCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. BautistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Smith v. Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. BoulterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API