Collins v. Otto
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Day
The parties appear here as in the trial court and will be so referred to or by name.
The plaintiff was a four-year-old child who, through his mother as next friend, brought suit against the de fendants. He alleged defendants owned and wrongfully harbored a coyote, a wild animal of vicious propensities, and that on May 22, 1960, the child was attacked and bitten by the coyote and seriously injured.
Trial to a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendants, from which the plaintiff seeks reversal by writ of error.
In the trial of the case the testimony was not in any material aspect…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Tipton v. Town of TaborSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Palermo v. NailsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Frobig v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Vigil by and Through Vigil v. PayneColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gilbert v. ChristiansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.