Legal Opinion
Williams v. City of Vallejo
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 1918No. Civ. No. 1774PublishedCited by 7 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This action was brought by plaintiff to recover judgment for the sum of $3,496.44, with interest at seven per cent from February 29, 1912, and for costs of action against the defendant city of Vallejo, and the defendants Pryor, Blake and Chappelle, as individuals, by reason of their having been at the time the alleged indebtedness occurred, members of the board of public works of the city of Vallejo. It is alleged in the complaint that on-the nineteenth day of June, 1911, the city of Vallejo “duly and regularly authorized the board of public works of the city of Vallejo to accept the bid of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Loop Lumber Co. v. Van Loben SelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Dinan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Burke v. Board of Trustees Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Smith v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Callahan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.