Legal Opinion
State v. Bejar
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1984No. 7503PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Convicted of possession of heroin with intent to distribute contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-20(A)(3) (Repl.Pamp. 1980), defendant appeals. The sole issue on appeal is sufficiency of the evidence. Issues raised in the docketing statement and not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned.
Officers went to defendant’s home to serve a search warrant. They knocked on the front door and announced their presence. They heard movement inside the house and “scurrying” activity. They forced the door open. Defendant was pulled from the bathroom with his left arm wet almost to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. LankfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. SearlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ParisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. BowersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. WoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. WoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. BankertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. JamesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.