Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1975No. 7526SC350PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

It appears that defendant did not docket his record on appeal within the time prescribed by the rules of this Court. He has, however, filed a petition for a writ of certiorari from which it appears that counsel was not remiss nor negligent but mailed the record on appeal in ample time for it to have been received by the Clerk within the time allowed. We, therefore, have allowed the petition for a writ of certiorari and will review the defendant’s trial as requested.

Defendant brings forward four contentions for consideration. Defendant maintains that: (1) the court violated an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. StepneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Soles v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. CloningerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. RoseboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API