Legal Opinion

Webster v. Schwartz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 15, 1957No. 36,832PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dele, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the additional defendant entered pursuant to a motion for summary judgment. On January 5, 1955, plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants Paul Schwartz and Penn Development Company. The complaint alleged that plaintiff and ihe defendants entered into a joint venture for the purpose of purchasing, developing, and selling real estate in the city of Minneapolis; that certain real estate, including that described in the complaint, was acquired by the plaintiff and the defendants; that defendants were endeavoring to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Brannan v. ShertzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Anderson v. EnfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thermorama, Inc. v. ShillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Sandstrom v. WahlstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Tomlinson Lumber Sales, Inc. v. J. D. Harrold Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. In Re Estate of SandstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Webster v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API