Legal Opinion
Brannan v. Shertzer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1954No. 36,190, 36,191PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
Plaintiffs, Mnrrel J. Brannan and Mabel C. Clark, appeal from separate orders denying their motions for new trials in two negligence actions which were consolidated for trial.
On the evening of July 7, 1951, Brannan was driving Mrs. Clark’s automobile in a southerly direction on Nicollet avenue in Minneapolis. She was riding with him in the front seat. At the intersection of said avenue and Eleventh street, Brannan brought the automobile to a complete stop in obedience to a traffic light located at the intersection. While waiting for the signal to change to “go” the automobile…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hinkle v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cayuna Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Litman v. WalsoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. DanberrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Bryant v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Turenne v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
3Cited by20 opinions
- Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Genzel v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Bisbee v. RuppertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Berg v. UllevigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Jacoboski v. PraxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.