Legal Opinion

Tomlinson Lumber Sales, Inc. v. J. D. Harrold Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 7, 1962No. 38,408PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Plaintiff asserts a cause of action for money due and owing from the sale of lumber furnished defendant for the construction of housing. Defendant counterclaims for breach of warranty and fraud. The jury awarded plaintiff $52,748.65, which was the precise balance plaintiff claimed. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appeals.

Defendant is a partnership which late in 1956 or early in 1957 contracted to erect 300 homes at Hoyt Lakes for Erie Mining Company at a cost exceeding $3,265,000. Having previously had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lowrey v. DingmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Ylijarvi v. BrockphalerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Dale Ex Rel. Smith v. PushorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Schimmelpfennig v. GaedkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Luther v. Standard Conveyor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Envall v. Independent School District No. 704Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Davis v. Midwest Discount Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Glen Lewy 1990 Trust v. Investment Advisors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Harry N. Ray, Ltd. v. First National Bank of Pine CityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API