Legal Opinion
Stix Friedman & Co. v. Coyle
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided April 7, 1972No. 71 C 735(1)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
340 F.Supp. 4 (1972)
STIX FRIEDMAN & CO., Inc., Plaintiff,
v.
Eugene C. COYLE, Jr., District Director of Internal Revenue, Defendant.
No. 71 C 735(1).
United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.
April 7, 1972.
Henry C. Lowenhaupt and Richard D. FitzGibbon, Lowenhaupt, Chasnoff, Freeman, Holland & Mellitz, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
Daniel Bartlett, Jr., U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., Richard F. Mitchell, Trial Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant.
MEMORANDUM
MEREDITH, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Continental Equities, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Stix Friedman & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Eugene C. Coyle, Jr., District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Morris A. Shenker and Lillian K. Shenker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Grand Jury InvestigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973