Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Poresky
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 6, 1933PublishedCited by 682 opinions
1Per curiam
Leave is asked to file a petition for a writ of mandamus requiring District Judge Elisha H. Brewster, or other competent Judge, to call to his assistance two other Judges for the purpose of hearing and determining petitioner’s application for an interlocutory injunction, as directed by statute. Jud. Code, § 266; 28 U.S.C. 380.
Petitioner brought suit in the District Court of the United States against Joseph E. Ely, Governor, Joseph E. Warner, Attorney General, and Morgan T. Ryan, Registrar of Motor Vehicles, of Massachusetts, to enjoin the enforcement of chapter 90 of the General Laws of Massa…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by682 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
677 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.