Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Investigation

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 7, 1973No. Misc. 974 MCDPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HERMAN, District Judge.

At issue before this court is the government’s request that Amerigo Ferranti be held in contempt for failure to answer questions before a federal grand jury.

Ferranti is a beer distributor doing business in Scranton, Pennsylvania. On March 15, 1973, two attorneys attached to the Antitrust Division, Middle Atlantic Division, Department of Justice, visited Ferranti at his office. The discussion lasted approximately one hour, after which the attorneys departed. Mr. Ferranti signed no written statement, nor was he apparently asked to do so.

Subseque…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Brendan H.New York City Family Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API