Legal Opinion

Devin ex rel. Devin v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 7, 1967No. 40934Published

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error William Mac Devin, a minor then twelve years of age, sustained permanent injuries while mowing the lawn of Floyd B. Jones, the defend*344ant in error. William Mac Devin brought suit to recover damages for his injuries and the pain, suffering and disability resulting therefrom. The minor’s father, Mac Devin, by separate suit, sought recovery for hospital, medical and doctor’s expenses incurred as the result of the injuries to his minor son.'

The two cases were consolidated for trial to a jury which resulted in verdicts for the defendant in error, Jones. Judgment was entered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curtis & Gartside Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Braasch v. Michigan Stove Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Frank Unnewehr Co. v. Standard Life & Accident Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  4. Huffman v. Oklahoma Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Employers Casualty Co. v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API