Legal Opinion

Employers Casualty Co. v. Underwood

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 7, 1930No. 18698PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, C.

Defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced this action against plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover indemnity on a policy of insurance. .

The policy is a combination employer’s liability and indemnity contract. Paragraph 1 (d) of (lie policy was to “indemnify this employer against loss by reason of the liability imposed upon him by law on account of such injury to such employees (of the insured) as are legally employed. * * *”

During the period which the policy was in force, Ered Garrett, a boy under the age of 16 years, was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sterling v. Union Carbide Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Curtis & Gartside Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Braasch v. Michigan Stove Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Casperson v. MichaelsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Gallenkamp v. . Garvin Machine CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gulf Atlantic Warehouse Co. v. BennettAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Teel v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Devin ex rel. Devin v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Devin ex rel. Devin v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Opinion No. 72-292 (1973) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API