Legal Opinion

Great Western Motors, Inc. v. Hibbard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1920No. 15922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered February 28, 1919, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action in replevin.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

On July 29, 1918, the plaintiff sold a Paige automobile to the defendant under a conditional bill of sale contract. After making several payments, the defendant refused to make other payments, whereupon the plaintiff commenced this action in replevin and took the automobile into its possession. The material allegations of the complaint were denied by an*542swer, and by way of further defense and cross-complaint, the defendant alleged he bought the car upon the representations of the plaintiff that it was new, a 1918 model, and in excellent mechanical condition; that the representations were made…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bennett v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Litchfield v. HutchinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Lawson v. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Hanson v. TompkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Sears v. StinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. v. George P. Mitchell, George P. Mitchell v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. County Commissioners v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  3. Smith, Jr. Et Ux. v. BlafkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. May v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Biehn v. BannickWashington Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API