In Re Wilkins
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
Attorney Michael A. Wilkins is an experienced appellate practitioner. In a brief supporting a petition for transfer to this Court, he stated that an opinion of the Indiana Court of Appeals left him wondering whether the Court of Appeals was determined to find for the adverse party, and whether it then said whatever was necessary to reach that conclusion. We find today that such statements violated Ind.Professional Conduct Rule 8.2(a) and warrant the respondent’s suspension from the practice of law in this state.
This case is now before us upon the hearing officer’s findings…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of RobakIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- In the Matter of FriedlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Matter of BeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Matter of GarringerIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Sports, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Martin v. EssrigColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- William Caldwell Hancock v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- In Re WilkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Matter of: Thomas M. DixonIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re WilkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.