Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Sports, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Michigan Mutual Insurance Company appeals the jury verdict in favor of Imperial Lanes of Sports, Inc. We affirm.
ISSUES
1. Whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury.
2. Whether the punitive damage award violates due process.
FACTS
Beginning in the 1970’s, Imperial Lanes, Inc. owned a bowling alley in Terre Haute. One of the long-time shareholders was Pierre Miller. Miller had been a chartered property casualty underwriter (CPCU) since 1955 and had operated his own Terre Haute insurance agency since 1964. In the late 1980’s, he was president of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wallace v. RosenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gallant Insurance Co. v. IsaacIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Malone v. BaseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re WilkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Coachmen Industries, Inc. v. DunnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.