Legal Opinion
In the Matter of: Thomas M. Dixon
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided October 8, 2013No. 71S00-1104-DI-196PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission filed a “Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action,” against Respondent Thomas M. Dixon, charging him with attorney misconduct based on statements he made in support of a motion for a change of judge. Respondent’s 1995 admission to this state’s bar subjects him to this Court’s disciplinary jurisdiction. See Ind. Const, art. 7, § 4.
This matter is now before the Court on the report of the hearing officer appointed by this Court to hear evidence on the verified complaint and on the post-hearing briefing by the parties. We conclude that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Stephen YagmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington v. John Jarrette SandlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Matter of TerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY v. Larry Edward PARRISHTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. GastNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Joshua A. Gray v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.