Legal Opinion
In Re Wilkins
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 2003No. 49S00-0005-DI-341PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUCKER, Justice.
Respondent has moved that I disqualify myself from participation in this case. More precisely, he has filed a petition for rehearing from this Court's 3-2 decision sanctioning him for violating Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 8.2(a). In part, respondent seeks rehearing "in order for Justice Rucker to address whether recusal is appropriate in light of his participation on the Court of Appeals' panel in Michigan Mutual Insurance Company v. Sports, Inc., 698 N.E.2d 834, 845 (Ind.Ct.App.1998)." Consolidated Pet. for Reh'g and Mot. for Justice Rucker to Recuse at 8.
To place…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- In the Matter of Bradford MasonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Pepsico, Inc., and Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Honorable Thomas R. McMillen Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Peterson v. BorstIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- M.A. v. H.H. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018