Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Friedland
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1981No. 379S65PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.,
This cause was initiated in a three-count verified complaint filed by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 12. During the course of the proceeding, on motion of the Respondent, a grievance filed by James W. Bradford was merged with the complaint as Count IV. In accordance with the provisions of Admission and Discipline Rule 23, an appointed Hearing Officer has conducted a hearing of this matter and filed with this Court his Findings of Fact. On motion of the Respondent, oral argument in this cause was heard on July…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In Re PrimusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Matter of GemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DeMaioCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- In Re WilkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.