Legal Opinion
Midwest Fastener Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 1, 2018No. Court 17-00131; Slip Op. 18-132PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGary S. Katzmann, Judge
Katzmann, Judge: In this iteration of litigation centering on whether a product is classified as a nail, plaintiff Midwest Fastener Corp. ("Midwest") challenges the Department of Commerce's ("Commerce") determination that its imported zinc and nylon anchors fall within the scope of the Certain Steel Nails From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Countervailing Duty Order , 80 Fed. Reg. 41,006 (Dep't Commerce July 14, 2015), and Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders , 80 Fed. Reg.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Sioux Honey Ass'n v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Midwest Fastener Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Midwest Fastener Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Catfish Farmers of Am. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025