Legal Opinion
Midwest Fastener Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 19, 2018No. Slip Op. 18-142; Court 17-00231PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Judge:
This action is before the court on Midwest Fastener Corp.'s ("Midwest" or "Plaintiff") USCIT Rule 56.2 motion for judgment on the agency record challenging the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Commerce") determination that Plaintiff's strike pin anchors are subject to the antidumping duty ("ADD") order covering certain steel nails from the People's Republic of China ("PRC"). See Pl.' [Midwest]'s Rule 56.2 Mot. J. Agency R., Jan. 26, 2018, ECF No. 26; Mem. Law Supp. Pl.'s Rule 56.2 Mot. J. Agency R., Jan. 26, 2018, ECF No. 26 ("Pl.'s Br."); see also [ADD] Order on Certain Steel…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Eckstrom Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- King Supply Co., LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Midwest Fastener Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019