Legal Opinion
Sioux Honey Ass'n v. Hartford Fire Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 7, 2012No. 2011-1040PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Under federal trade law imported products are often assessed antidumping duties in an effort to prevent these products from undercutting the domestic market. The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”), which has since been repealed, directed the government to distribute collected duties to domestic producers harmed by dumping. 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a) (2000). In this case, Plaintiffs are domestic producers seeking distributions under the CDSOA. Plaintiffs also attempt to compel the assessment and collection of additional antidumping duties. The United…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Union Steel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Heino v. Dept. Of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Union Steel v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Columbus Regional Hospital v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Matthew Thomas v. UBS AGCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.