State v. Martinez
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVINE, Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant, Joseph George Martinez, Sr., appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of methamphetamine for sale. He also appeals from the imposition of consecutive sentences for that offense and the separately charged offense of knowingly manufacturing a dangerous drag. We conclude sufficient evidence supports his conviction for possession of methamphetamine for sale. We also find no error in the imposition of consecutive sentences because the two offenses were distinct, could be committed separately, and imposed separate risks. Therefore, we affirm.
FACTS AND…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MathersArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. ArredondoArizona Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. McDonaghCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State KingstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021