Legal Opinion

State v. McDonagh

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 7, 2013No. 1 CA-CR 12-0083PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THUMMA, Judge.

¶ 1 John Patrick McDonagh appeals from sentences imposed after a jury convicted him of four counts of aggravated driving under the influence (aggravated DUI). McDonagh argues the fines, surcharges and assessments imposed for each of the four counts violate Arizona law because all four counts arose from the same act of driving. Because Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 13-*2481161 prohibits cumulative punishment for the same act, and because there is no applicable clear, contrary legislative directive, McDo-nagh’s sentences are modified to clarify that payment of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. State v. SiddleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. State v. DustinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. State v. AntwineCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. State v. Bryann Kristine LemmonsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API