Legal Opinion
State v. Arredondo
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1987No. CR-86-0163-APPublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOELLER, Justice.
JURISDICTION
Victor Manuel Arredondo (defendant) was charged with having conspired with co-defendant Felipe Gonzales to murder Encarnación Rivera. A jury found him guilty as charged. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-1003(D), the trial court imposed a sentence of life imprisonment. The single issue raised on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. §§ 12-102, 13-4031, and -4033. We affirm because we conclude the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict and because our review of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. FalconeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Bruce Dunn, Richard Austin Mandeville, Joseph Harvey Zeligs, Darold Lanier Milligan, Richard Lee ShinafeltCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- State v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. StroudArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Doyle v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn HausnerArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. RoseberryArizona Supreme Court · 2005
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.