Chelmsford Colonial Real Estate Co. v. Forrest
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtGould, J.
This is an action of contract to recover a real estate broker’s commission. The trial court entered an amended finding for the plaintiff in the sum of $1800.00, the amount agreed upon by all parties in the event that the plaintiff was entitled to a finding.
At the conclusion of the evidence the defendant made the following requests for rulings:
1. The evidence is insufficient to warrant a finding for the plaintiff.
2. The evidence warrants a finding for the defendant.
*373. The evidence is insufficient to warrant a finding that the plaintiff was ever authorized to negotiate or act as defendant’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Perry v. HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Stella v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Barnes v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Home Savings Bank v. SavranskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cardiff v. DalpeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
- Blakeslee v. GuardioneMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1981
- Burton Foster Insurance Agency, Inc. v. McNeilMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
- Cardiff v. DalpeMassachusetts District Court · 1982