Legal Opinion
Cardiff v. Dalpe
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided March 3, 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTiffany, J.
This is an action in contract in which the plaintiff buyers seek to recover a $5,000.00 real estate deposit pursuant to a financing contingency clause in the parties’ purchase and sales agreement.
Two reports have been signed by the trial justice and forwarded to this Division. The first has been presented by the plaintiff, the prevailing party in the trial court, on the grounds of a procedural challenge to the timeliness of the defendant’s draft report under Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P. Rule 64. The second report was presented by the defendant and relates to substantive questions of law wherein…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stabile v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Hill v. Mayor of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Hobart-Farrell Plumbing & Heating Co. v. KlaymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Lembo v. WatersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
- Livoli v. StonemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richardson v. Foodmaster Supermarket, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
- DeWolfe New England v. TichMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1989
- Eastern Tank of Peabody, Inc. v. MooreMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1986
- Cutler Construction, Inc. v. Omni Builders, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1985
- Nonantum Lumber Co. v. JSL Construction Services Management Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.