Legal Opinion

Cardiff v. Dalpe

Massachusetts District Court

Decided March 3, 1982No. 8720Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Tiffany, I.

This is an action in contract in which the plaintiffs, buyers, seek to recover a $5,000.00 real estate deposit pursuant to a financing contingency clause in the parties-’ purchase and sale agreement.

Two reports have been signed by the trial justice and forwarded to this Division. The first has been presented by the plaintiff, the prevailing party, in the trial court, on the grounds of a procedural challenge to the timeliness of the defendant’s draft report under Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P. 64. The second report was presented by the defendant and relates to substantive…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stabile v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  2. Hill v. Mayor of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Hobart-Farrell Plumbing & Heating Co. v. KlaymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Lembo v. WatersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
  5. Livoli v. StonemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API