In Re: Joseph Lee Moore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
The only question before us on this appeal is the constitutionality of G.S. 35-36 through G.S. 35-50, inclusive.
The respondent attacks these statutes on the grounds that they are violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Law of the Land Clause of Article I, Section 19, of the Nprth Carolina Constitution, both from procedural and substantive standpoints, that they deny the respondent equal protection of the law, are unconstitutionally vague and arbitrary, and provide for cruel and unusual punishment. The term “law…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Matter of MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Tri-County Paving, Incorporated v. Ashe County Ashe County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- State v. TatumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- In the Matter of MoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.