Legal Opinion

Pointer v. Six Wheel Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1949No. 12146PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

In January, 1925, H. Y. Stebbins requested Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company, the present sole owner of the appellee, Six Wheel Corporation, to manufacture for him a form of six-wheel attachment on a time and material basis. One specimen was built and tried out. It proved rather rigid if one wheel of the dual axle assembly was raised. Garner L. Knox, patentee of the patent in suit, No. 1926727 and president of the appellee, suggested, at the time, to Stebbins that a universal joint be put where the rocker arm attached to the axle bracket. Stebbins, however, was of…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Pannu v. Iolab Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. James C. Hobbs v. United States of America, Atomic Energy CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Moist Cold Refrigerator Co. v. Lou Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Mayview Corp. v. RodsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API