Legal Opinion
Moist Cold Refrigerator Co. v. Lou Johnson Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 17, 1957No. 15057PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for damages for patent infringement of Reissue Patent No. 23,05s.1 *It was tried in the District Court with a jury. Prior to the trial, Lou Johnson Co. and Meier & Frank Co., both corporations, were eliminated as defendants.
The remaining defendants moved for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case 2 upon the grounds of (1) the invalidity of the patent because of (a) anticipation by the Anderson patent, (b) anticipation by the Anderson patent plus the Larkin patent, (c) aggregation without new results, (d) invalid specifications, (e)…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Biodex Corporation v. Loredan Biomedical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community Hospital, Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.