Berger v. Van Sweringen Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.
The first question to be determined is whether plaintiffs are entitled to enforce the restrictive covenants covering defendants’ land against the defendants.
It is defendants’ contention that only owners of property within a subdivision or allotment may enforce such covenants against other owners within the same subdivision or allotment, and that, since defendants ’ land has never been subdivided, plaintiffs are not within the same subdivision and are, therefore, not entitled to enforce such covenants.
This question has not previously arisen before this court. There is language in cases from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- EDWARDS v. SurrattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Dixon v. Van Sweringen Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
- Russell Realty Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. CraftOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Central Motors Corp. v. City of Pepper PikeOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
- LuMac Development Corp. v. Buck Point Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- University Hills, Inc. v. Robert H. Patton, Bert Maxwell, Jr. And Layton A. HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Rooney v. Peoples Bank of Arapahoe CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.